Grassland Wildfire
Wildfire in Grass-Dominated Landscapes
In grass-dominated landscapes, spatial, temporal and social dimensions of wildfire risks are challenges for land managers whose goal is to meet the needs of their communities while maintaining the ecological integrity and ecosystem services of the lands they manage. Grass-dominated landscapes, characterized by an abundance of fine fuels and dry conditions, are prone to fire and pose heightened risks to communities. Strategic fuel treatments can reduce the probability of large or extreme fire events by reducing fuel loads, modifying vegetation structure and creating defensible spaces to lessen the impact of wildfire. However, in grass-dominated landscapes, more frequent and long-term management is needed to maintain efficacy (Conver et al., 2018).
One of the primary challenges lies in developing adaptive strategies that consider the dynamic nature of grass landscapes, climate influences and the need for effective risk reduction to ensure long-term resilience against wildfire threats. Fire, both wildfire and prescribed fire, is a necessary step towards reducing wildfire risks to people and assets, and for the long-term goal of grass restoration (Donovan et al., 2023). In grass-dominated landscapes, where fire can quickly affect communities, well-planned fuel treatments are essential for safeguarding lives, assets, and natural resources while fostering sustainable land management practices. However, further research is needed for guidance in designing landscape-scale fuel treatments in grass-dominated landscapes.
These factors underscore the necessity for efforts to assess, communicate and enact management strategies grounded in risk reduction, with the goal of improving land conditions, reducing management costs, and most importantly, reducing risk to people, assets, natural resources and landscapes. Land management strategies will need to adapt to changes in climate and increasing populations that also incorporate the health and function of landscapes to support continued stewardship, sustainability and plan for future disturbances and land-type changes (Cruz et al., 2022).
Wildfire Fuels Management Practices in Grass-Dominated Landscapes
In response to the complex challenges posed by fire risks in grasslands, we have produced an online resource developed in collaboration with the Southern Rockies Fire Science Network and the Great Plains Fire Exchange.
This comprehensive overview aims to equip land managers, policymakers and partners with essential knowledge on grassland fire behavior and effective management approaches. Grasslands, the most imperiled terrestrial ecosystem on earth, face numerous threats including altered wildfire regimes, invasive species, and impacts of human land use and climate change.
The development of this review is driven by the critical need to address the escalating wildfire risks and challenges faced in these landscapes. By summarizing the latest research findings and science, our goal is to provide land managers, policymakers and partners with a foundation of information on fire behavior and management approaches specific to grass-dominated landscapes. First, we introduce the dominant fuel types found in grass-dominated landscapes and review fire behavior and risks, followed by information on critical weather conditions that can affect fire, particularly in grass fuels. Finally, this overview provides some fundamental information on management methods and recommendations including defensible space and fuel break information for grass-dominated landscapes.
Our goal with this overview report is to provide the fundamental information needed to support effective wildfire mitigation management decisions and actions, ultimately enhancing the safety and resilience of communities adjacent to grass fuels. Through this endeavor we aim to facilitate informed decision-making, promote resilience and mitigate the adverse impacts of wildfires on both landscapes and communities.
Significance
Grasses represent a critical component of many landscapes. In landscapes where grasses are the predominant vegetative fuel type, these regions are characterized by an abundance of fine fuels and can be particularly vulnerable to wildfire due to their rapid fuel accumulation and high fire frequency. Complications in these landscapes include changes associated with dynamic and complex processes such as altered wildfire regimes, invasive species, including woody encroachment and conifer expansion, human land use and modification, and impacts resulting from a changing climate. These impacts have led to a loss of at least 80% of these grasslands, including a loss of 99% of tallgrass prairie (Blair et al., 2014; U.S. Fish & Wildlife, 2024), resulting in grasslands being the most imperiled terrestrial ecosystem on the planet, experiencing a far greater rate of conversion than forests (Scholtz et al., 2022).
Increasingly arid conditions, modifications to grass-dominated landscapes and invasive species have contributed to elevated wildfire behavior and risk (Ford et al., 2021). Wildfires occurring in areas predominantly populated by fine rapidly igniting fuels, like those found in grass-dominated landscapes, can quickly impact communities within the wildland-urban interface (WUI) with little forewarning. In such instances standard predictions of fire spread may not be capable of issuing timely emergency warnings in advance of a fast-moving fire (Cruz et al., 2022). Consequently, communities situated in grass-dominated landscapes may require different guidelines concerning defensible space, home hardening, and other fire risks and hazards (Wells et al., 2021).
Forests FM: CSFS Podcast
Episode 6: Grassland Fire
Grassland fires are occurring more frequently in the West, and with a year-round fire season, it’s more relevant than ever to keep a close eye on our grassland fuels. In this episode, Janae Coston-Malpas, Wildfire Resilience Coordinator for the CSFS, shares new expertise on grassland fuels management. You’ll hear how Colorado’s climate, winds and mountains all shape grassland conditions in the wildland-urban interface. We share guidance for land managers to approach grassland fuels management and information for homeowners to build familiarity with grasslands, home hardening and local community wildfire protection plans.
Key Terms
- Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) – Plans that bring together diverse local interests to discuss their mutual concerns for public safety, community sustainability and natural resources. CWPPs help inform local firefighting capability, defensible space around homes and subdivisions and how to prioritize land management on both federal and non-federal land.
- Defensible space – The area around a home or other structure that has been modified to reduce fire hazards. In this area, natural and manmade fuels are treated, cleared or reduced to slow the spread of wildfire.
- Fuel break – An area where the quantity of fuels is reduced or eliminated and acts as a barrier to fire growth.
- Fuels management – Involves altering the structure and amount of fuels to reduce fire behavior and create access points for fire management resources.
- Grassland – Ecosystems marked by dominance or co-dominance of grasslike vegetation, including grass, sedges and rushes
- Grassland fuel connectivity – Describes how grasslands wildfires can link to other fuel sources like forests or urban areas
- Heterogeneous landscape treatments – Efforts that disrupt the continuity of fuels and increase the patchiness of fuels can reduce the rate of fire spread and fire intensity (e.g., combinations of mechanical, herbicide, grazing and prescribed fire).
- Live Wildfire Ready – Learn how to protect your home and property.
- Vegetative Fuels – Plant material that is readily ignitable (e.g., grasses).
- Wildfire Mitigation – On-the-ground treatments of properties implemented to reduce the chance of a wildfire causing damage.
- Wildland-Urban Interface – Areas where human development is close to, or within, natural terrain and flammable vegetation.
Additional Resources
For additional resources or specific questions, contact the following partners:
The goal in the development of this overview is to provide basic information that can help develop guidance for land managers and practitioners to promote safe and effective wildfire mitigation and fuels management for grass-dominated landscapes. This peer-reviewed resource covers overarching fuel treatment concepts for these landscapes based on the best current knowledge. It is provided as a non-regulatory document to serve as a compilation of current literature and is intended to complement—and does not replace—experience and sound judgment. As each environment can be uniquely multifaceted and dynamic, these general guidelines cannot substitute for regional-specific guidance and management specifications. While portions of this resource describe management practices, these practices and strategies may not be suitable for all situations or scenarios.
This overview was composed by Janae Coston-Malpas, Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS), with contributions and guidance by Chad Julian (CSFS), Gloria Edwards, Southern Rockies Fire Science Network (SRFSN), and Carol Baldwin, Great Plains Fire Science Exchange (GPFSE).
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to these individuals for their contributions and technical reviews:
- Rob Addington, The Nature Conservancy
- Allen Gallamore, Colorado State Forest Service
- Nathaniel Goeckner, Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Division for City of Louisville
- Jonathan Henn, University of Colorado Boulder
- Field Peterson, Colorado State Forest Service
- Abrahamson I.L. (2013). “Fire regimes in Hawai’ian plant communities.” Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.
- Addington R.N., Tavernia B.G., Caggiano M.D., Thompson M.P., Lawhon J.D., Sanderson J.S. (2020). “Identifying opportunities for the use of broadcast prescribed fire on Colorado’s Front Range.” Forest Ecology and Management.
- Adusumilli S., Chaplen J.E., Blunck D.L. (2021). “Firebrand Generation Rates at the Source for Trees and a Shrub.” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering. Volume 7.
- Alexander M.E., Heathcott M.J., Schwanke R.L. (2011). “Fire Behavior Case Study of Two Early Winter Grass Fires in Southern Alberta.” Alberta Government. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9_14
- Blair J., Nippert J., Briggs J. (2014). “Grassland Ecology.” Ecology and the Environment. The Plan Sciences (8).
- Borsum D., Plouffe K. (2020). “Malden Fire, Eastern Washington.” National Weather Service.
- Boulder County (2023). “Marshall Fire Investigative Summary and Review.”
- Bragg, T. (2015). “Fire in the Northern Great Plains of North America. Great Plains Fire Science Exchange.” GPE publication 2015-1.
- Brown P.M., Battaglia M.A., Fornwalt P.J., Gannon B., Huckaby L.S., Julian C., Cheng A.S. (2015). “Historical (1860) forest structure in ponderosa pine forests of the northern Front Range, Colorado.” Rocky Mountain Research Station. Scientific Journal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. Volume 45, Pages 1462-1473.
- Butler B.W., Anderson W.R., Catchpole E.A. (2007). “Influence of Slope on Fire Spread Rate.” RMRS-P-46CD.
- Butte County District Attorney (2020). “The Camp Fire Public Report.”
- Caggiano M.D., Beveridge D. (2022). “Integrating Potential Operational Delineations (PODs) into Community Wildfire Protection Plans: Guidance for Community Planners.” Colorado Forest Restoration Institute. Colorado State University.
- Caggiano, M.D., Hawbaker T.J., Gannon B.M., Hoffman C.M. (2020). “Building Loss in WUI Disasters: Evaluating the Core Components of the Wildland-Urban Interface Definition.” Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University.
- Carter S., Goeckner N., Julian C., Langelo C., Shonle I., Dennis C. (2023). “Low-Flammability Landscape Plants.” Fact Sheed 6.305. Colorado State Forest Service and Colorado State University Extension.
- Chambers J.C. (2016). “Great Basin Factsheet Series 2016 – Information and tools to restore and conserve Great Basin ecosystems.” Great Basin Fire Science Exchange. Reno, Nevada. 79 p.
- Cohen J.D. (1999). “Reducing the wildland fire threat to homes: Where and how much.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning, and Policy: Bottom Lines. PSW-GTR-173. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Pacific Research Station. P189-195.
- Colorado State Forest Service (2020). “Colorado Forest Action Plan.”
- Colorado State Forest Service (2012). “The Home Ignition Zone guide.”
- Colorado State Forest Service (2023). Live Wildfire Ready.
- Conver J.L, Falk D.A., Yool S.R., Parmenter R.R. (2018). “Modeling Fire Pathways in Montane Grassland-Forest Ecotones.” Fire Ecology. Vol.14, 17-31.
- Country Fire Authority (2023). “On the Land: Agricultural Fire Management Guidelines.”
- Cruz M.G., Alexander M.E., Kilinc M. (2022). “Wildfire Rates of Spread In Grasslands under Critical Burning Conditions.”
- Dennis C.F. (2005). “Fuelbreak Guidelines for Forested Subdivisions & Communities.” Colorado State Forest Service.
- Donovan V.M., Fogarty D., Twidwell D. (2023). “Spot-fire distance increases disproportionately for wildfires compared to prescribed fires as grasslands transition to Juniperus” PLos ONE 18(4): e0283816.
- Durran D.R. (2022). “Downslope Winds.” University of Washington.
- Ellsworth L.M., Newingham B.A., Shaff S.E., Williams C.L., Strand E.K., Reeves M., Pyke D.A., Schupp E.W., Chambers J.C. (2022). “Fuel reduction treatments reduce modeled fire intensity in the sagebrush steppe”. Ecosphere.
- Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires (2020). Edited by Manzello, S.L.
- Engle D.M., Bidwell T.G. (2001). “Viewpoint: The response of central North American prairies to seasonal fire”. Journal of Range Management. Volume 54, No. 1, 2-10.
- Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) (accessed 2023). U.S. Department of Agriculture.
- Fogarty , Baldwin C., Bauman P., Beaver J., Bruegger R., Cram D., Goodman L., Hovick T., Overlin A., Scasta D., Spackman C., Thompson A., Treadwell M.L., Twidwell D. (2023). “Rangeland Production lost to woody encroachment in Great Plains grasslands.” Great Plains Grasslands Extension Partnership. University of Nebraska. GPGEP-UNL-01.
- Ford P., McPherson G.R. (1996). “Ecology of fire in shortgrass prairie of the southern Great Plains.” RM-GTR-285.
- Ford P., Reeve M., Baldwin C. (2021). “Shortgrass Steppe in the Southern Great Plains: Prescribed Fire, Drought, Production and Grazing.” Great Plains Fire Science Exchange, GPE publication-#2021-1.
- Frangieh N., Accary G., Rossi J., Morvan D., Meradji S., Marcelli T., Chatelon F. (2021). “Fuelbreak effectiveness against wind-driven and plume-dominated fires: A 3D numerical study.” Fire Safety Journal. Vol. 124.
- Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., Kerby, J., & Hamilton, R. (2009). Pyric Herbivory: Rewilding Landscapes through the Recoupling of Fire and Grazing. Conservation Biology, 23(3), 588–598.
- Fusco E.J., Finn J.T., Balch J.K., Nagy R.C., Bradley B.A. (2019). “Invasive grasses increase fire occurrence and frequency across US ecoregions.” Biological Sciences. 116 (47) 23594-23599.
- Fynn R.W.S., Morris C.D., Edwards T.J. (2004). “Effect of burning and mowing on grass and forb diversity in a long-term grassland experiment.” Grassland Science. School of Applied Environmental Sciences; Agricultural Research Council – Range and Forage Institute. Applied Vegetation Science 7: 1-10, 2004.
- Gercke D..M., Stewart S.A. (2007). “Strategic Placement of Treatments (SPOTS): Maximizing the Effectiveness of Fuel and Vegetation Treatments on Problem Fire Behavior and Effects.” RMRS-P-41.
- Ghodrat M., Shakeriaski F., Nelson D.J., Simeoni A. (2021). Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures. Fire.
- Gray R., Dunivan M., Jones J., Ridenour K., Leathers M., Stafford K. (2007). “Cross Plains Texas Wildfire Case Study.” Texas Forest Service, Texas A & M University.
- Great Basin Fire Science Exchange. “More Area Burned in Non-Forest Than Forest in the West.” (2023).
- Haas J.R., Calkin D.E., Thompson M.P. (2014). “Wildfire Risk Transmission in the Colorado Front Range, USA.” Risk Analysis. Vol. 35, Is 2, 226-240.
- Higgins K.F., Piehl J.L., Kruse A.D. (1989). “Prescribed Burning Guidelines in the Northern Great Plains.” South Dakota University. Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. Extension Circulars. Paper 430.
- Hood, S. (2023). “How effective are landscape scale fuel treatments.” Connected Science, September 2023. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
- Julian C., Hoffman C. (2024). Personal conversation.
- Knapp E.E., Valachovic Y.S., Quarles S.L., Johnson N.G. (2021). “Housing arrangement and vegetation factors associated with single-family home survival in the 2018 Camp Fire, California.” Fire Ecology 17, 25.
- Leis S.A. (2013). “Fuels management in the Great Plains.” Great Plains Fire Science Exchange, GPE publication #2013‐28.
- Maranghides A., Link E., Brown C., Walton W., Mell W., Hawks S. (2023). “A Case Study of the Camp Fire – Notification, Evacuation, Traffic, and Temporary Refuge Areas.” Technical Note (NIST TN). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- Marshall Fire Facilitated Learning Analysis (2021).
- Mell W., Jenkins M.A. Gould J. Cheney P. (2007). “A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires”. International Journal of Wildfire.
- Middlemis-Brown S. (2015). “Vegetation Responses to Prescribed Burning of Grazed Shortgrass Steppe, A summary of David J. Augustine and Daniel G. Milchunas.” GFE publication 2015-4. Great Plains Fire Science Exchange.
- Mueller E., Skowronski N., Clark K., Kremens R., Gallagher M. Thomas J., El Houssami M., Filkov A., Butler B., Hom J., Mell W., Simeoni A. (2015). “Initial Results from a Field Experiment to support the assessment of fuel treatment effectiveness in reducing wildfire intensity and spread rate”. RMRS-P-73.
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2023). “Meteorological Analysis of the August 2023 Maui Wildfires.” Global Modeling and Assimilation Office.
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2022). “Wet, then dry extremes contributed to devasting Marshall Fire in Colorado.”
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2024). “Climate context of the February 2024 megafire outbreak in Texas.”
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2024). “Fires Rage Across Texas Panhandle.”
- National Wildfire Coordinating Group (accessed 2023). “Glossary of Wildland Fire.” PMS 205.
- Nature Conservancy, The. (2022). Restoring Fire to Native Grasslands.
- Nature Conservancy, The. (accessed 2023). Maintaining Fire’s Role. Great Plains.
- North American Invasive Species Management Association (NAISMA) (2023). “The Tragedy in Lahaina: How invasive grasses and shrubs are fueling the wildfire crisis in Hawai’i.”
- Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools (REMS) (accessed 2024). “Wildfire: The Camp Fire in Paradise.”
- Rouet-Leduc, J., Pe’er, G., Moreira, F., Bonn, A., Helmer, W., Shahsavan Zadeh, S. A. A., Zizka, A., & van der Plas, F. (2021). Effects of large herbivores on fire regimes and wildfire mitigation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(12), 2690–2702.
- Russell W.H., McBride J.R. (2003). “Landscape scale vegetation-type conversion and fire hazard in the San Francisco Bay area open spaces.” Landscape and Urban Planning. Volume 64, Issue 4, 201-208.
- Ryan, K. C., Knapp, E. E., & Varner, J. M. (2013). Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice, and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(s1), e15–e24.
- Scasta J.D., Estep C.E., Barrett T.T., Gray C., Lautenbach J., Boggs-Lynch L.A., Ott C.W., Skovgard J.L., Wilbur R., Hoffner L. (2019). “Burning Irrigation Ditches.” University of Wyoming. B-1351.
- Schachtschneider C. (2016). “Targeted Grazing Applied to Reduce Fire Behavior Metrics and Wildfire Spread: Master’s Thesis.”
- Scholtz, R., Twidwell D. (2022). “The last continuous grasslands on Earth: Identification and conservation importance.” A journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. Volume 4, Issue 3.
- Scott J.H., Burgan R.E. (2005). “Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel’s Surface Fire Spread Model.” U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Research Station. RMRS-GTR-153.
- Scott J.H., Thompson M.P., Calkin D.E. (2013). A Wildfire Risk Assessment Framework for Land and Resource Management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-315. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p.
- Shinneman D.J., Aldridge C.L., Coates P.S., Germino M.J., Pilliod D.S., Vaillant N.M. (2018). “A conservation paradox in the Great Basin-Altering sagebrush landscapes with fuel breaks to reduce habitat loss from wildfire: U.S. Geological Survey Open-Fire Report.” 2018-1034, 70 p.
- State of Washington Department of Natural Resources (2020). “Wildland Fire Investigation Report.”
- Sullivan A.L. (2010). “Grassland Fire Management in Future Climate”. Advance in Agronomy. Volume 106, 173-208.
- Texas A&M (accessed 2023). “Protection of Rangeland and Pastures from Wildfire.”
- Thompson, M.P., Vogler, K.C., Scott, J.H. (2022). “Comparing risk-based fuel treatment prioritization with alternative strategies for enhancing protection and resource management objectives.” Fire Ecology. Volume 18, 26.
- Town of Superior (2022). “Marshall Fire Operational After-Action Report.”
- Trauernicht C., Kunz M. (2021). “Fuel Breaks and Fuels-Management Strategies for Pacific Island Grasslands and Savannas.” University of Hawaii. RM-22.
- S. Department of Agriculture (accessed 2023). “Virtual Fencing: A Climate Adaptation Strategy.”
- S Department of Agriculture (2016). “Fuel break.” Natural Resources Conservation Service.
- S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Prescribed Fire Resource Mobilization Strategy. (2023). U.S. Forest Service. FS-1216.
- S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (1999). Agricultural Air Quality Task Force (AAQTF) Agricultural Burning Policy Recommendations. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
- S. Department of the Interior (2017). “Canal Operation and Maintenance: Vegetation.” Reclamation, Managing Water in the West. Bureau of Reclamation.
- S. Fish and Wildlife Service (accessed 2024). Central Grasslands Conservation.
- Vermeire L.T., Strong D.J., Gates E.A., Marlow C.B., Waterman R.C. (2020). “Can Mowing Substitute for Fire in Semiarid Grassland?” Rangeland Ecology & Management. Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 97-103.
- Vogel, R.J. (1979). “Some Basic Principles of Grassland Fire Management”. Environmental Management.
- Wade D.D. (2013). “Flame descriptors.” Southern Fire Exchange. SFE Fact Sheet 2013-6.2 p.
- Watershed Center, The in collaboration with Boulder County Fireshed Grasslands Working Group (2023). “Grassland Management in Boulder County.”
- Weir J.R., Bidwell T.G., Elmore R.D., Hickman K.R., Fuhlendorf S.D., Engle D.M. (2009). “Weed control on rangelands.” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service. NREM-2882.
- Wells A.G., Munson S.M., Sesnie S.E., Villareal M.L. (2021). “Remotely Sensed Fine-Fuel Changes from Wildfire and Prescribed Fire in a Semi-Arid Grassland”.
- Wendt, J. A. F., McWethy, D. B., Hempson, G. P., Brookshire, E. N. J., & Fuhlendorf, S. D. (2023). Past and present biomass consumption by herbivores and fire across productivity gradients in North America. Environmental Research Letters, 18(12), 124038.
- Werth P. A., Potter B.E., Alexander M.E., Cruz M.G., Clements C.B., Finney M.A., Forthofer J.M., Goodrick S.L., Hoffman C., Jolly W.M., McAllister S.S., Ottmar R.D., Parsons R.A. (2016). “Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume 2 for Fire Behavior Specialists, Researchers, and Meteorologists”. PNW-GTR-891.
- Wheeler B. (2014). “Fuel break Management”. Pheasants Forever.
- Wragg P.D., Mielke T., Tilman D. (2018). “Forbs, Grasses and Grassland Fire Behavior”. Journal of Ecology.
- Zhou A. (2019). “Fire Ember Production from Wildland and Structural Fuels”. JFSP PROJECT ID: 15-1-04-4.